检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁群明 门瑞雪[2] YUAN Qunming;MEN Ruixue(College of Humanities&Sciences of Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130017,China)
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学人文学院,吉林长春130017 [2]长春中医药大学
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2020年第12期1863-1867,共5页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:吉林省社会科学基金项目(编号:2019q4)。
摘 要:目的:探讨大学生在控制感剥夺情况下马基雅维利主义对心境的影响。方法:采用实验组对照组前后测实验设计,以概念推理任务范式剥夺个体控制感,对224名大学生进行马基雅维利主义人格量表、控制感中文修订版量表以及简明心境内省量表的测量。结果:在4种实验处理中,4组被试控制感的得分具有统计学意义(F=2.764,P=0.043)。随机反馈引起了控制感的剥夺;无反馈与"正确"反馈不能引起被试控制感的剥夺;"错误"反馈与实验组、对照组均无统计学意义,不能作为实验处理方式。高分对照组、低分对照组、低分实验组心境得分无统计学意义,但均显著高于高分实验组(P<0.05)。结论:在个体控制感被剥夺时,高马基雅维利主义者产生了更强的心境改变。Objective:To explore the effect of Machiavellianism on the mood states under the deprivation of control.Methods:With experiment group-control group and front-back test design,the individual sense of control was deprived by the task of figure out the concept.A total of 224 college students were investigated with Machiavellianism scale,Control Scale and the Brief Mood Introspection Scale.Results:In the four experimental treatments,the control scores of the four groups were statistically significant(F=2.764,P<0.05).Random feedback caused the control deprivation.No feedback and "correct" feedback could not cause the control deprivation.The "Error" feedback wasn’t statistically significant with the experimental group and the control group,and it couldn’t be used as an experimental treatment(P>0.05).The mood state scores of high score control group,low score control group and low score experimental group were not statistically significant different(P>0.05),but all were significantly higher than the group of high score experimental group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The high Machiavellians have a stronger mood change under the deprivation of control.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117