检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张永 ZHANG Yong(Burn Treatment Centre,Xinxiang Second People's Hospital,Xinxiang 453000,Henan Province,China)
机构地区:[1]新乡市第二人民医院烧伤诊疗中心,河南新乡453000
出 处:《罕少疾病杂志》2021年第1期15-16,共2页Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
摘 要:目的分析采取负压封闭引流术(VSD)治疗早期深度电烧伤创面的临床效果。方法选择深度烧伤创面患者48例作为研究对象,按入院时间的不同,将伤后48h内入院的患者24例作为观察组,将同期伤后48h后入院的患者24例作为对照组,均进行手术扩创及负压封闭引流术,对两组患者的临床效果进行分析比较。结果观察组创面清洁时间、创面愈合时间分别为(8.12±1.34)、(26.18±3.16)d,优于对照组[(11.67±3.65)、(35.48±7.24)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论早期深度电烧伤创面患者采取负压封闭引流术的临床效果显著,可促进创面恢复,在临床中具有良好的应用价值。Objective To analyze the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage(VSD)in the early treatment of deep wounds caused by the electric burn.Methods Forty-eight patients with deep burn wounds were selected as the research subjects.According to admission time,24 patients admitted to the hospital within 48 hours after injury were included in the observation group,and 24 patients admitted beyond 48 hours after injury were included in the control group.All subjects were treated with surgical debridement and VSD,and the clinical effects of the two groups were comparatively analyzed.Results The wound cleaning time and wound healing time of the observation group[(8.12±1.34)d and(26.18±3.16)d]were shorter than those of the control group[(11.67±3.65)d and(35.48±7.24)d](P<0.05).Conclusion VSD is effective in the treatment of patients with early deep wounds caused by the electric burn.It can promote wound recovery,with good application effect in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222