检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琦 WANG Qi(School of Marxism,Anhui University of Science and Technology,Huainan,Anhui 232001,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽理工大学马克思主义学院,安徽淮南232001
出 处:《平顶山学院学报》2021年第1期110-114,共5页Journal of Pingdingshan University
摘 要:民国初年的1913—1914年,在新加坡华媒视野中,白朗起义既不是传统学界所主张的反帝反封建的农民起义,也不是当今学者所认为的“一场带有辛亥革命时期历史印记的土匪运动”,而是以哥老会为核心的秘密社会所发起的一次“以暴易暴”的政治抗争。这场起义沉重打击了袁世凯政权的政治威望与国际声誉,也意味着传统秘密结社近代政党化转型的失败与清末以来旧式会党起义的式微。In the view of Chinese media in Singapore at the beginning of the Republic of China,the Bai Lang uprising is neither a traditional anti-imperialist and anti-feudal peasant uprising,nor"a bandit movement with the historical mark of the 1911 Revolution",as the researchers think today.It is a political struggle initiated by the secret society with the core of the society of Gelaohui.The uprising had a heavy blow to the political prestige and international reputation of Yuan Shikai's regime,and also meant the failure of the transformation of the traditional secret association into a political party in modern times and the decline of the old style party uprising since the end of Qing Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38