《民法典》救济标价错误网络商家合同权益的路径初探——以“羊毛党”恶意下单现象为例  

A Preliminary Study on the Ways of Civil Code to Relieve the Rights and Interests of Internet Merchant when They Misprice——Taking the Wool Party placing orders maliciously as an example

作　　者：邹开亮[1] 王米娜 Zou Kailiang;Wang Mina

机构地区：[1]华东交通大学人文社会科学学院

出　　处：《价格理论与实践》2020年第8期29-33,共5页Price:Theory & Practice

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(项目编号:17FSB2043)。

摘　　要：“羊毛党”利用网络商家标价错误恶意下单以攫取不正当利益,致使网络商家损失惨重甚至关张歇业,已经成为我国电子商务产业发展中的一大“顽疾”。面对“羊毛党”恶意下单行为,受制于现行法倾斜保护消费者权益的惯性理念、电子商务合同的特殊成立规则、商家“最终解释权”立法态度不明、违约或履约成本高昂等综合制约因素,网络商家常常被逼入绝境。基于《民法典》规范的体系化优势,通过发挥公平、诚信原则的权益矫正功能,合理解释网络合同成立规范,利用补充性解释填补意思表示漏洞,用足“有过失”制度的衡平机制,可以为标价错误网络商家合同权益的救济提供有效路径。The Wool Party has used Internet merchants mispricing to grab illegitimate profits maliciously,resulting in heavy losses and even shuttering stores.It has become a stubborn headache in the development of China's e-commerce industry.Faced with the Wool Party placing orders maliciously,Internet merchants are often cornered.Because of current law's concept that incline to protect the rights and interests of consumers,special rules of concluding e-commerce contracts,unclear Legislators'attitudes of the final interpretation rights,and combined constraints such as high cost of default or execution.The China's Civil Code which has systemic advantages that can provide a new remedy path for Internet merchants when they misprice.The Code can use correction function by principles of fair and integrity,reasonably explain the rules for entering into contracts,use supplementary explanations to fill the declaration of will and the equity mechanism of contributory negligence.

关 键 词：《民法典》 标价错误 恶意下单 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D922.294[政治法律—法学]