检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周小斌[1] 谢林海[1] 陈小波[2] 杨涛[1] 方婷 邹虹 ZHOU Xiao-bin;XIE Ling-hai;CHEN Xiao-bo;YANG Tao;FANG Ting;ZHOU Hong(Department of Dermatoplast,The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical Universityy,Ganzhou,Jiangxi 341000;Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University,Ganzhou,Jiangxi 341000)
机构地区:[1]赣南医学院第一附属医院皮肤整形科,江西赣州341000 [2]赣南医学院第一附属医院康复医学科,江西赣州341000
出 处:《赣南医学院学报》2020年第11期1115-1119,共5页JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
基 金:江西省卫生健康委员会科技计划项目(20204467)。
摘 要:目的:探讨负压封闭引流术对压疮感染创面血管和神经生成的影响。方法:选择我院2018年1月至2019年12月治疗的86例Ⅲ、Ⅳ期压疮感染创面患者作为研究对象,根据住院号顺序编号,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各43例;观察组予负压封闭引流术治疗,对照组采取换药治疗;以创面感染控制时间、创面愈合时间、McGill疼痛评分、创面面积、压疮愈合计分表(PUSH)评分、微血管数量、神经生长因子(NGF)为观察指标。结果:观察组感染控制时间、创面愈合时间均短于对照组,McGill疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗21 d时创面面积较治疗前明显缩小,PUSH评分较治疗前明显降低,与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组与对照组相比在治疗7 d、14 d微血管数量及NGF阳性细胞数均比较多;观察组与对照组微血管数量及NGF阳性细胞数变化趋势有差别(P<0.05)。结论:负压封闭引流术较传统换药能更好的控制压疮创面感染,明显促进压疮创面血管和神经生成,提高创面愈合速度,是一种疗效较好的治疗方法。Objective:To investigate the effects of vacuum sealing drainage on the blood vessels and nerve formation of wounds.Methods:Eighty-six patients with stageⅢandⅣpressure ulcer wounds treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected as subjects,according to the order of admission,they were divided into observation group and control group randomly,43 cases each;observation group was treated with negative pressure closed drainage,and control group was treated with dressing.Wound cleaning time,wound healing time,McGill pain score,wound area,pressure ulcer healing score(PUSH)score,microvascular number,nerve growth factor(NGF)were observed.Results:The wound cleaning time and wound healing of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,the McGill pain score was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the wound area of the observation group was significantly smaller than that before treatment,and the PUSH score was significantly lower than that before treatment.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);compared with the control group,the observation group had more microvessels and NGF positive cells on the 7th and 14th days of treatment,the observation group and the control group had different changes in the number of microvessels and NGF positive cells(P<0.05).Conclusion:Negative pressure closed drainage can significantly promote the blood vessel and nerve formation of infected wounds in pressure wounds and improve the healing speed of wounds,it is an ideal therapy choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.46.129