检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘菲[1] LIU Fei
机构地区:[1]湖北警官学院,湖北武汉430034
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2020年第6期109-115,共7页Journal of Sichuan Police College
基 金:国家社科基金“习近平总书记关于反恐怖人民战争战略思想研究”(17CKS008);2019年度湖北省人文社科重点研究基地社会治安治理研究中心立项(资助)项目“突发事件恢复重建问题研究”(2019A002)。
摘 要:我国《突发事件应对法》第62条确立了应急总结性机制,即在突发事件处置完毕后,通过全面的治理评估,查找应急管理各环节的不足进而总结应急管理工作的经验和教训并在此基础上制定改进措施的一系列方式和方法。当今社会已步入风险时代,我国有一些同类突发事件反复出现,应急总结性机制似乎陷入了一种“事件爆发-调查总结-再爆发-再总结”的死循环。究其原因,主要症结在于反思停留在口号上,排查流于“运动式”做法。对此,可从重塑应急理念、强化常态执法、拓宽交流途径、完善问责制度四个方面予以优化改进,以期预防和规避同类事件的反复性。Article 62 of Emergency Response Law establishes an emergency summary mechanism,that is,after an emergency is handled,a series of ways and methods are developed to summarize the experience and lessons of emergency management based on a comprehensive governance assessment to find out the deficiencies of each link of emergency man⁃agement.Nowadays,the society has stepped into the age of risk,and some similar emergencies appear repeatedly in China.The emergency summary mechanism seems to fall into a dead cycle mode of“incident outbreak-investigation and summary-re-outbreak-re-summary”.The main reason lies in that the reflection stays in the slogans and the investigation stays in a mere formality.The emergency response concept should be reshaped,the normal law enforcement should be strengthened,the communication channels should be broadened and the accountability system should be perfected to prevent and avoid the recurrence of similar incidents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3