检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈勇[1] 韩金花[2] 刘青云[1] 韩俊[1] 蒋现永 钟群琼 余国力 隗世波[1] CHEN Yong;HAN Jin-hua;LIU Qing-yun;HAN Jun;JIANG Xian-yong;ZHONG Qun-qiong;YU Guo-li;WEI Shi-bo(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Hanyang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430081,Hubei Province,China;Department of Radiology,Affiliated Central Hospital of Qingdao University,Qingdao 266042,Shandong Province,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学附属汉阳医院重症医学科,湖北武汉430081 [2]青岛大学附属中心医院放射科,山东青岛266042
出 处:《中国CT和MRI杂志》2021年第2期162-164,共3页Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基 金:湖北省卫生厅科研基金项目(JX5A07)。
摘 要:目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)、多层螺旋CT(MSCT)后处理技术对隐匿性骨折的诊断价值。方法对我院2016年12月至2018年12月收治的115例常规X线检查阴性而高度怀疑为隐匿性骨折的外伤患者,分别采用MRI、MSCT对疑似骨折部位进行检测,对比两种检测诊断方式的检测结果、阳性率和特异性。结果MRI对隐匿性骨折诊断的灵敏度、准确度分别为96.08%、93.04%,明显高于MSCT检查(P<0.05);两者在骨折特异性和骨折类型诊断差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论MRI检查对隐匿性骨折的诊断优于MSCT检查。Objective To explore the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT)post-processing techniques on occult fractures.Methods 115 traumatic patients with negative routine X-ray examination and high suspicion of occult fractures from January 2016 to March 2018 in our hospital were given MRI and MSCT to detect suspected fracture sites.The detection results,positive rate,and specificity of the two detection methods were compared.Results The sensitivity and accuracy of MRI with 96.08%and 93.04%were higher than those of MSCT in the diagnosis of occult fractures(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the two in the diagnosis of fracture specificity and fracture types(P>0.05).Conclusion MRI is superior to MSCT in the diagnosis of occult fractures.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R445.3[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112