检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尚海龙[1] 翟琳 SHANG Hai-long;ZHAI Lin(School of Law ,Hebei University,Baoding Hebei 071000,China)
出 处:《河北大学成人教育学院学报》2020年第4期119-124,共6页Journal of Adult Education College of Hebei University
基 金:河北省社会科学基金项目“新时代雄安新区城市协同治理法治化研究”(编号:HB18FX002)。
摘 要:我国政府信息公开制度自建立以来,豁免的信息就一直存在争议,其中的过程性信息由于标准未定一直是信息诉讼争议中的焦点。2019年,我国《政府信息公开条例》将过程性信息规定为相对豁免公开的信息,但是对于其认定问题并未做出规定,进而导致实践中的争议愈加频繁。基于这一现实情况,严格对过程性信息进行认定成为当前的首要任务。因而,分析信息背后逻辑,利用行政程序与信息状态分析相关判决,进而通过法律解释认定过程性信息是当今法律实务中的关键点。Since the establishment of China’s government information disclosure system,the exempted information has been controversial,and the procedural information has always been the focus of information litigation disputes because of the undetermined standard.In 2019,China’s legal system stipulated the procedural information as the relatively exempted information,but there was no provision for its identification,which led to more frequent disputes in practice.Based on this reality,strict identification of procedural information has become the primary task at present.Therefore,analyzing the logic behind information,using administrative procedures and information status to analyze relevant judgments,and then identifying procedural information through legal interpretation has become the key points in today’s practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31