民机座椅垫及座椅结构燃烧试验差异分析  

Differences in burner tests between seat cushion and seat structure

作　　者：吕峥烨[1] 黄卫星 侯振国 丁琨 李根[1] 吴双[1] 雍耀 黄宏寨 LYU Zhengye;HUANG Weixing;HOU Zhenguo;DING Kun;LI Gen;WU Shuang;YONG Yao;HUANG Hongzhai(Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute,Shanghai 201210,China)

机构地区：[1]上海飞机设计研究院,上海201210

出　　处：《民用飞机设计与研究》2020年第4期81-84,共4页Civil Aircraft Design & Research

摘　　要：客舱座椅是民机舱内材料最重要的组成部分之一,其阻燃能力可直接对民机客舱的防火安全性造成影响,为保障民机在空中的安全飞行,必须对其开展燃烧性能的研究。目前,测试民机座椅燃烧性能的试验主要由测试座椅垫可燃性能的座椅垫油燃烧器燃烧试验和测试座椅结构抗燃性能的座椅结构可燃性油燃烧器燃烧试验组成。这两种试验存在很多相似点,第一在试验过程中需使用相同的燃烧器,第二试验名称及多项试验指标均非常接近。但是,此前发表的文件从未对两种试验的差异作出解释,使其在测试过程中极易混淆,可能对客舱座椅材料上机前安全检查的质量造成严重影响。因此,本文对两种试验方法进行了论述,并从多方面解释了二者的差异。As one of the most important parts for civil aircraft,the flame ability research for civil aircraft seats is very important,which can directly influence the flame ability of the civil aircraft passenger cabin.At present,the flame ability for civil aircraft seat are researched by follow tests:1)the seat cushion oil burner test,which is carried to research the flame ability for seat cushion;2)magnesium alloy seat structure oil burner test,which is carried to research the flame ability for magnesium alloy seat structure.Although they were different tests,there were still many similarities between them:1)the research name and research scope of the seat cushion oil burner test and magnesium alloy seat structure oil burner test were highly similar;2)they used the same burner during the test process.These similarities may cause the error during the test process and seriously affect the quality and safety of the aircraft.Thus,in this paper,the test method for seat cushion oil burner test and magnesium alloy seat structure oil burner test has been introduced,and the differences between two tests have been discussed.

关 键 词：民机 座椅 油燃烧器 试验 

分 类 号：V223.2[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]