腹膜前间隙无张力修补治疗疝气的临床效果  

Clinical Effects of Tension-free Repair of Preperitoneal Space in the Treatment of Hernia

作　　者：单川 SHAN Chuan(Fushun Petrochemical General Hospital of Liaoning Province,Fushun 113006,China)

机构地区：[1]抚顺石化总医院,辽宁抚顺113006

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2020年第34期75-76,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨腹膜前间隙无张力修补治疗疝气患者的临床效果。方法选择2016年1月至2018年12月医院收治的84例疝气患者,随机进行分组,开腹组选择开腹疝气手术治疗,无张力修补组选择腹膜前间隙无张力修补手术治疗。比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果治疗前,两组各项SF-36简明健康状况量表(SF-36)评分相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,无张力修补组各项SF-36简明健康状况量表(SF-36)评分均高于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。无张力修补组手术操作时间短于开腹组,切口感染等并发症发生率低于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对疝气患者实施腹膜前间隙无张力修补手术治疗可获得较好的效果,且患者的生活质量较好。Objective To explore the clinical eff ect of tension-free repair of preperitoneal space in patients with hernia.Methods Eighty-four hernia patients admitted to the hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected and randomly divided into groups.The laparotomy group was treated with open hernia surgery,and the tension-free repair gro up was treated with tension-free preperitoneal space repair.Compare the treatment eff ect of the two groups of patients.Results Before treatmengt,the SF-36 scores of the two groups were similar(P>0.05).After treatment,the 36-item short-form health survey(SF-36)scores of the tension-free repair group were all higher than those in the laparotomy group,the diff erence was statistically signifi cant(P<0.05).The operation time of the tension-free repair group was shorter than that of the laparotomy group,and the incidence of complications such as wound infection was lower than that of the laparotomy group.The diff erence was statistically signifi cant(P<0.05).Conclusion Tension-free preperitoneal space repair surgery for hernia patients can achieve better results,and the quality of life of patients is better.

关 键 词：疝气 腹膜前间隙无张力修补 开腹 生活质量 

分 类 号：R656.2[医药卫生—外科学] R256.45[医药卫生—临床医学]