检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李炜炜[1] LI Weiwei(School of Humanities,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing 100876,China)
出 处:《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第6期9-17,共9页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:北京市社会科学基金项目“新时代语言符号在首都话语生态建设中的流变和传播应用研究”(19YYC015)。
摘 要:《纽约时报》在对中国环境形象建构中投射了传播者的价值观与意识形态,通过互文、隐喻、过度词汇化等手法,建构了片面追求经济增长下的人与环境失调、放任技术盲目发展的环境弗兰肯斯坦、政治管控背景下的环境积极分子抗争、崛起政治大国的国际环境话语权争夺等不实中国环境镜像。应用费尔克拉夫的批评话语研究理论,从言语描述、话语实践解释、社会实践阐释三个维度对《纽约时报》环境新闻语料库进行分析,不难发现该报话语实践背后的社会化权力和污名化中国环境与中国形象的铺垫效果。在中国主动发声的形象“自塑”建构进程中,需要提升中国形象话语建构与传播的“科学性”与“跨文化性”,以强化中国形象建构的认知范式与实践能力。The New York Times has casted corresponding ideology and value of the disseminator.The newspaper constructed illusions about the China’s environmental image including the disorder between human and nature under the extreme pursuit of economy,an environmental Frankenstein neglecting the control of the technology,the protest from environmental activists,the contention for the international discourse power of the environment by utilizing intertextuality,metaphor,excessive lexicalization and other techniques.Applying Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Theory,this paper analyzes the Environmental News Corpus of New York Times from three dimensions:speech description,discourse practice interpretation and social practice interpretation.It is not difficult to find the socialized power behind the discourse practice of this newspaper and the paving effect of stigmatizing China’s environment and China’s image.It is hereby proposed that scientificity and transcultural features should be further enhanced to improve the cognition paradigm and practical competence of the Chinese self-image construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7