检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱翔宇 于永宁[1] Zhu Xiangyu;Yu Yongning(不详)
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院
出 处:《山东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第1期32-38,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:激烈的商业竞争环境中,企业破产已成为市场更迭的常态;但是由于我国现行法律将未解散企业的破产申请设置为一项权利而非义务,导致众多本该破产的企业没有被申请破产,成为了僵而不死的“僵尸企业”。为解决上述问题,在解释论进路上,应明确董事的破产申请义务人地位,在信义义务范围内,对董事的破产申请义务进行解释学构建;在立法论进路上,应对董事违反破产申请义务的责任承担与免责作出法律上的特别规定。Fierce business competition nowadays has made corporate bankruptcy normal in market alternation.However,due to the current law of China that defines bankruptcy application of companies to be dissolved as a right rather than an obligation,many companies that should have gone bankrupt have not been filed for bankruptcy and become"zombie companies".To solve the above-mentioned problems,this paper puts forward the following proposals:Concerning the interpretative theory,the status of the directors of bankruptcy filing obligations should be clarified,within the scope of fiduciary duty,the bankruptcy filing obligations of directors should be hermeneutically constructed;Accordingly,concerning the legislative theory,special legal regulations are to be formulated concerning the liability and exemption of directors who violate the bankruptcy obligation.
分 类 号:D922.291.92[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30