检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高洁 Gao Jie(Law Department,Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210023,China)
出 处:《新疆警察学院学报》2019年第3期36-41,共6页Journal of Xinjiang Police College
基 金:江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目:警察裁量权司法审查标准研究(编号:2019SJA0511);南京森林警察学院公安业务改革与创新研究团队的阶段性成果。
摘 要:司法审查能较好起到规制行政规范性文件的作用,但是进入司法审查必须明确其启动要件,即依据行政诉讼法53条进行司法审查应当满足的条件。目前由于在启动主体要件、时限因素、关联性等方面规定不清、界定模糊,导致相当一部分附带审查的诉求得不到法院支持,行政诉讼法的规定被架空。通过对启动要件的分析,进一步明晰司法介入行政的门槛,能更好实现司法对行政规范性文件的规制功能。Judicial review plays a better role in regulating the administrative normative documents.To enter the judicial re⁃view,it is necessary to clarify its starting requirements,that is,the conditions that should be met for judicial review according to Article 53 of the administrative procedure law.At present,due to the unclear provisions and vague definition of the main elements,time limit factors,relevance and so on,a considerable part of the demands of the incidental review are not supported by the court,and the provisions of the administrative procedure law are ignored.By analysing the starting elements,we can further clarify the threshold of judicial intervention in administration,so as to better realize the regulatory function of the judiciary on administrative normative documents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166