检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏天辉[1] 毛佩琦[2] WEI Tianhui;MAO Peiqi(不详)
机构地区:[1]河南师范大学法学院,河南新乡453007 [2]中国人民大学历史学院,北京100872
出 处:《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第1期175-183,228,共10页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:在皇权推动下,明英宗正统时期确立诏狱审判程序,其法律性质上属于司法惯例,而非规范化的法律审判程序,这给后世皇帝突破程序留下空间。在诏狱审判程序设计上,具有皇权主导、参与部门权力相互制衡和非法司部门参与的特点,但其运行过程中,因程序设计上的先天不足、参与部门非法定授权、违反权力制衡规律等因素,带来司法审判不公,被权臣所操纵等弊端,其历史命运也走到尽头。Withthe promotion of the imperial power,the jail trial procedure was established by Emperor Ming Yingzong in the Zhengtong period of the Ming dynasty.Its legal character is a matter of judicial practice,rather than a standardized jail trial procedure,which leaves room for later emperors to improve the procedure.In the design of the jail trial procedure,imperial power played a leading role,with a balance between involved departments and participation of non-judicial department.However,factors such as congenital deficiency in procedure design,illegal authorization by departments involved,violation of the check and balance of power during the operation processbrought to some disadvantages such as injustice in judicial trial and manipulation by powered ministers,thus leading to its final collapse.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49