“福禄诺节略”真相再研究  

Shedding New Light on the Truth of The Fournier Note

作　　者：王志强 WANG Zhi-qiang

机构地区：[1]海南师范大学历史文化学院,571158

出　　处：《史林》2020年第6期115-122,218,共9页Historical Review

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“越南汉喃文献整理与古代中越关系研究”(18ZDA208)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1884年5月11日,《中法简明条款》签订后,因“福禄诺节略”的撤兵接防日期问题,导致北黎冲突。作为冲突的关键证据,“福禄诺节略”一直被大陆学界认为是李鸿章为逃避责任而伪造的证据。通过本文的研究发现,“福禄诺节略”中的撤兵接防日期确系福禄诺本人涂抹。为了执行茹费理让清朝立即执行《中法简明条款》第二款撤兵的命令,福禄诺与李鸿章又达成了一个关于撤兵接防日期的口头协议。依据《万国公法》,该“口头协议”不具备近代外交上的法律效力。据此,福禄诺应该为北黎冲突负主要的外交责任。It is generally held that the Fournier Note,which is said to be fabricated by Li Hongzhang,be responsible for the outbreak of Bac Le Incident in 1884.The present paper attempts to prove that the note was indeed modified by Fran?ois Ernest Fournier himself,who also reached a verbal agreement with Li.Nevertheless,the verbal agreement was not legally valid in accordance with the international law.Thus,Fournier,the French admiral,must be responsible for the Sino-French military conflict.

关 键 词：福禄诺节略 李鸿章 北黎冲突 《中法简明条款》 

分 类 号：K256.2[历史地理—历史学]