检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:房清侠 Fang Qingxia(School of Criminal Justice,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046)
机构地区:[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450046
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2021年第1期77-83,共7页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:事后恢复行为以罪刑一体化为理论根基,具有减轻犯罪性的作用,实践中将事后自动恢复行为仅作为酌定量刑情节的做法不利于鼓励犯罪人及时后退。故将事后自动恢复行为上升为法定量刑情节进行轻刑化评价,既符合量刑责任原则的要求,又能进一步提升对刑事被害人的保护机能。为了更好地回应司法实践,体现刑罚的立法公正,在立法上应采用二元的立法模式,对事后自动恢复行为减轻或免除处罚。The recovery behavior after the crime takes the integration of crime and punishment as the theoretical foundation and has the function of mitigating the crime.In practice,the self-recovery behavior after the crime is only regarded as the discretionary sentencing circumstances,which is not conducive to encouraging offenders to repent in time.Therefore,the behavior of self-recovery after the crime should be upgraded to the legal circumstances of sentencing for light punishment evaluation,which is not only in line with the principle of sentencing responsibility,but also can further enhance the protection function of criminal victims.In order to better respond to the judicial practice and reflect the legislative justice of penalty,the dual legislative mode should be adopted in the legislation to reduce or exempt the punishment for the behavior of self-recovery after the crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38