检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙铭成 SUN Mingcheng(School of Law,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)
出 处:《重庆电子工程职业学院学报》2020年第6期32-35,共4页Journal of Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering
摘 要:电子票据作为商业贸易和大数据时代的应然产物,具有重大的商业价值及发展前景,但电子票据适用现行法仍有着法律地位缺失、签章效力未定等困境,这将在一定程度上束缚我国电子票据的发展。通过比较法对比分析研究,据此认为电子票据的法律地位应于《票据法》中加以明晰,具体方式可通过新增电子票据一章予以落实。另外,可以通过目的性扩大解释的方法,将电子盖章纳入《票据法》签章的范围,为电子票据的积极发展提供法律上的支撑。As a natural product of commercial trade and the era of big data,the electronic bill has great commercial values and development potentials.However,the electronic bills applicable to the current law still have some difficulties such as the lack of legal status and uncertain validity of signatures and seals.It will,to some extent,restrict the development of electronic bills of our country.Through comparative analysis and study,the author thinks that the legal status of electronic bills should be made clear in“The Law of Negotiable Instruments”by adding a chapter of electronic bills.In addition,the electronic seal can be included in the scope of the current law by means of expanding the interpretation,which can provide the legal support for the positive development of electronic bills.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.99.38