单纯闭合性小儿股骨干骨折两种治疗方法的临床效果比较  

Comparison of Clinical Effects of Two Treatment Methods of Simple Closed Femoral Shaft Fracture in Children

作　　者：孟永智 Meng Yongzhi(Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Linxia 731100, China)

机构地区：[1]临夏州妇幼保健院,甘肃临夏731100

出　　处：《黑龙江科学》2021年第2期66-67,共2页Heilongjiang Science

摘　　要：比较单纯闭合性小儿股骨干骨折两种治疗方法的效果。选择52例单纯闭合性股骨干骨折患儿,根据治疗方式的不同分为治疗组和对照组,每组各26例。对照组实施持续牵引治疗,治疗组实施内固定术治疗,比较两组患儿的临床指标变化情况及治疗效果。治疗组的负重时间、骨折愈合时间及住院时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05),与健肢长度差值低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗组的治疗优良率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。对单纯闭合性小儿股骨干骨折实施手术治疗,可显著改善患儿的临床症状,促进骨折愈合,疗效确切。The research compares the clinical effects of two treatment methods of simple closed femoral shaft fracture in children.52 children with simple closed femoral shaft fracture are selected.According to different treatment methods,they are divided into treatment group and control group,with 26 children in each group.Control group receive continuous traction treatment,and treatment group receive internal fixation treatment.Clinical index change situation and treatment effects of two groups are compared.Load bearing time,fracture healing time and hospitalization time of treatment group are significantly shorter than control group(P<0.05).Differences of length of healthy limbs are lower than control group(P<0.05).The excellent and good rates of treatment group are significantly higher than control group(P<0.05).Operation treatment of simple closed femoral shaft fracture in children can significantly improve clinical symptoms of the children,promote the healing of fracture,and have good effect.

关 键 词：单纯闭合性股骨干骨折 保守治疗 手术治疗 临床效果比较 

分 类 号：R683.41[医药卫生—骨科学]