检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:倪丽莉[1] 王菁[1] 刁飞扬[1] 马翔[1] 冒韵东[1] 刘嘉茵[1] 刘金勇[1] NI Li-li;WANG Jing;DIAO Fei-yang;MA Xiang;MAO Yun-dong;LIU Jia-yin;LIU Jin-yong(Reproductive Medicine Center,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院生殖医学中心,210029
出 处:《国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志》2021年第1期1-5,22,共6页Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81730041,81571403);国家重点研发计划(2017YFC1001604,2016YFC1000603);江苏省卫生厅项目(YXZXB2016001)。
摘 要:目的:探讨自然排卵周期、氯米芬(CC)及来曲唑(LE)诱导排卵周期的排卵前优势卵泡直径对供精人工授精(AID)助孕结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月—2019年8月南京医科大学第一附属医院进行的2675个自然排卵AID周期、547个CC诱导排卵AID周期、1566个LE诱导排卵AID周期的超声及临床资料;分别按排卵前优势卵泡直径分组,了解助孕结局随优势卵泡直径的变化特征,并据此设立各排卵方案的卵泡直径优势组及对照组;采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析验证优势组在宫内妊娠及持续妊娠方面的相对优势。结果:自然周期卵泡直径16.0~19.9 mm时的宫内妊娠率(23.01%vs.19.13%,aOR=1.260,P=0.035)及持续妊娠率(20.57%vs.16.88%,aOR=1.277,P=0.034)均高于卵泡直径≥20.0 mm时;CC诱导排卵周期卵泡直径18.0~21.9 mm时的宫内妊娠率高于卵泡直径<18.0 mm或≥22.0 mm时(26.86%vs.16.85%,aOR=1.898,P=0.036);LE诱导排卵周期卵泡直径18.0~20.0 mm时的宫内妊娠率(23.90%vs.18.08%,aOR=1.405,P=0.013)及持续妊娠率(22.28%vs.16.35%,aOR=1.449,P=0.009)均高于卵泡直径<18.0 mm或>20.0 mm时。结论:AID助孕中,自然周期、CC及LE诱导排卵周期的排卵前卵泡直径最佳范围分别为16.0~19.9 mm、18.0~21.9 mm及18.0~20.0 mm。Objective:To investigate the relastionship between preovulatory dominant follicle size(PDFS)and the outcome of artificial insemination with donor sperm(AID)in natural cycle(NC)and the ovulation induction cycles using clomiphene citrate(CC)or letrozole(LE)respectively.Methods:The clinical data of 2675 natural cycles(NC-AID),547 CC-induced cycles(CC-AID)and 1566 LE-induced cycles(LE-AID)in AID procedures performed between January 2012 and August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.These AID cycles were respectively grouped according to preovulatory dominant follicle size(PDFS)to understand the variation characteristics of AID outcomes,and to group them respectively into two sub-groups:the dominant group and the control group.The relative advantages of the dominant group in terms of intrauterine pregnancy rate(IPR)and ongoing pregnancy rate(OPR)were analyzed by the univariate and multivariate logical regression.Results:In NC-AID,the IPR and OPR in PDFS 16.0-19.9 mm were significantly higher than those in PDFS≥20.0 mm(23.01%vs.19.13%,aOR=1.260,P=0.035;20.57%vs.16.88%,aOR=1.277,P=0.034).In CC-AID,the IPR in PDFS 18.0-21.9 mm was significantly higher than that in PDFS<18.0 mm or≥22.0 mm(26.86%vs.16.85%,aOR=1.898,P=0.036).In LE-AID,the IPR and OPR in PDFS 18.0-20.0 mm were significantly higher than those in PDFS<18.0 mm or≥20.0 mm(23.90%vs.18.08%,aOR=1.405,P=0.013;22.28%vs.16.35%,aOR=1.449,P=0.009).Conclusions:In AID procedure,the optimal ranges of PDFS in the NC,CC or LE cycles were 16.0-19.9 mm,18.0-21.9 mm and 18.0-20.0 mm,respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.253.166