检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谷亚妍 王悦娜[1] 刘昕[1] 刘袁秀[1] 闫志荣 GU Yayan;WANG Yuena;LIU Xin;LIU Yuanxiu;YAN Zhirong(General Practice Department,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150086,China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院全科医疗科,哈尔滨市150086
出 处:《护理管理杂志》2020年第12期891-894,903,共5页Journal of Nursing Administration
基 金:黑龙江省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(2018-437);黑龙江省属高等学校基本科研业务费科研项目(2018-KYYWF-0560)。
摘 要:目的以Donabedian模型为理论基础,构建科学、可行的城市社区全科护理质量评价体系。方法采用文献资料法和半结构访谈法编制评价体系初稿,应用Delphi函询法对33名专家进行两轮函询,构建城市社区全科护理质量评价体系。结果两轮函询后专家的权威系数为0.903,协调系数为0.522,表明专家对所有指标的意见集中程度较好,构建的城市社区全科护理质量评价体系包括一级指标3项、二级指标15项、三级指标45项。结论基于Donabedian模型构建的评价指标体系科学、可靠,可为今后城市社区全科护理质量的考评提供参考依据。Objective To establish a scientific general nursing quality evaluation index system for community based on Donabedian Model.Methods Based on results of literature review and semi-structured interviews,the first draft evaluation index system was formulated.Then two-round Delphi method was conducted among 33 specialists.Results Authority coefficients of experts was 0.903,and coordination coefficients indexes was 0.522,indicating that experts had high concentration of opinions on all indicators.The index system for community nurses included 3 first-level indicators,15 second-level indicators and 45 third-level indicators.Conclusion The quality index system for community is reliable and valid,which can provide guidance for the appraisal of community nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117