往复压缩机两种气量调节方式的比较  

Comparison of Two Air Volume Regulation Modes in Reciprocating Compressor

作　　者：陈青松 杨杨[2] 祝进 CHEN Qing-song;YANG Yang;ZHU Jin(SINOPEC-SK(Wuhan)Petrochemical Company Limited.,Wuhan 430081,China;SINOPEC Cangzhou Refining&Chemical Company,Cangzhou 061000,China;SINOPEC Anqing Petrochemical Company,Anqing 246000,China)

机构地区：[1]中韩(武汉)石油化工有限公司,湖北武汉430081 [2]中国石化沧州炼化公司,河北沧州061000 [3]中国石化安庆分公司,安徽安庆246000

出　　处：《压缩机技术》2020年第6期36-41,17,共7页Compressor Technology

摘　　要：增加气量调节系统是炼油厂大型往复压缩机重要的节能措施。本文通过对目前炼油厂主要使用的两种往复式压缩机气量调节方式即可变余隙调节和延时关闭气阀调节进行工作原理、使用情况、受力分析、故障特性及能效等各方面比较,总结各自的优缺点,为用户选定气量调节方式提供辅助参考。Increasing air volume control system is an important energy saving measure for large reciprocating compressor in oil refinery.In this paper,aiming at the two kinds of reciprocating compressor gas adjustment ways of variable clearance adjustment and delay closing valve adjustment mainly used in current oil refinery,the working principle,usage,stress analysis,failure characteristics and energy efficiency and so on various aspects are compared,the advantages and disadvantages of each are summarized.It has provided auxiliary reference for selecting volume adjustment ways.

关 键 词：余隙调节 延时关闭气阀调节 效率 计算 分析 比较 

分 类 号：TH457[机械工程—机械制造及自动化]