论投资协定下知识产权投资争议解决的路径  

The Paths of IP Investment Dispute Settlement Under Investment Treaty

作　　者：冯汉桥[1] Feng Hanqiao

机构地区：[1]湖南工业大学法学院,湖南株洲412007

出　　处：《南海法学》2020年第3期56-64,共9页The South China Sea Law Journal

基　　金：湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会项目“湖南创新产品交易平台的构建及其法律调适研究”(XZP17YBZC048)。

摘　　要：知识产权国际投资指在海外将知识产权资本化以取得收益的经济活动,知识产权国际投资争端解决路径经历了三个发展阶段。在国际投资协定下,知识产权争端存在着当事国之间、投资者母国与与东道国之间二类争议的解决路径,其中以后者适用较为普遍,特别是通过国际仲裁的方式。在实践中,出现了多种解决路径并行与相互协调的现象。为了解决投资协定中缺乏知识产权实体内容的问题,通过并入或纳入二种方式引入知识产权专门条约是常用的手段。协定下投资争端解决机制为知识产权国际投资提供了一个有效的保护途径,提高了保护的标准,同时也要考虑到此种机制的灵活性与结果不可预见性,并应采取相应的应对措施。International intellectual property(IP)investment defines as economic activities that make profits by capitalizing the intellectual property aboard.The dispute settlement solution of this kind of investment has gone through three stages.In light of international investment treaties,there exists two paths for dispute settlement of IP investment,those between treaty parties and those between investor’s state and host state,while the later path,es⁃pecially through international arbitration,was more frequently used.In practice,the adoption of parallel paths and co⁃ordination come into being.In order to address the issue of lacking substantial provisions of IP in investment treaties,two ordinary measures,namely the merging and the incorporation,are adopted to bring IP treaties in.The dispute settlement mechanism in investment treaties provides an effective protection path and raise the standard of protection to international IP investment,while in the mean time we should note that this mechanism has so much flexibility and unpredictability and some precautious measures should be taken correspondently.

关 键 词：知识产权国际投资 争端解决 投资协定 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学]