检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋彬龄[1] 曾捷 SONG Binling;ZENG Jie(Law School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,Hunan,China)
出 处:《上海体育学院学报》2021年第2期13-21,共9页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基 金:湖南省社会科学基金一般项目(17YBA367);湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会一般资助项目(XSP18YBZ089)。
摘 要:兴奋剂治理需要政府与体育组织共同合作。分析当前政府介入兴奋剂治理现状,以及在兴奋剂治理过程中政府与体育组织合作的阻滞因素,认为关键在于如何合理划定两者合作的界限。通过引入法社会学反身法理论,认为法律的主要任务在于促进社会子系统内部建立一种自我反思结构,而非诉诸具体细化的规范指令和高权干预,构建一种新的兴奋剂治理范式。政府可通过优化体育组织的内在话语程序,从信息、组织、权能等方面协助体育组织构建更具反思能力、半自主的兴奋剂治理体系。同时,提出反身法理论框架下兴奋剂治理策略。Anti-doping governance needs the cooperation of government and sport organizations.By the analysis of the goverment intervention against doping as well as the obstacles for the cooperation,it is stated that the problem is how to define the border between the two.The theory of reflexive law in sociology of law,the goal of which is to help the sub-system to establish self-reflexive structure internally rather than to create detailed and authoritative rules and power intervention,was thus introduced.In so doing a new anti-doping paradigm can be completed,in which government can optimize the internal discourse procedure,and assist the sports organization to establish a semi-autonomous anti-doping system from the aspects of information,organization structure,power and function,etc.The anti-doping governance strategy was finally put foward in the framework of relfexive law.
关 键 词:兴奋剂治理 政府 体育组织 反身法 体育自治 系统论
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.108.223