检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈映 许瑞庭[1] Chen Ying;Xu Ruiting(Department of Thyroid and Breast,People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region(First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University for Nationalities),Yinchuan,Ningxia 750000,China)
机构地区:[1]宁夏回族自治区人民医院<西北民族大学第一附属医院>甲状腺乳腺科,宁夏银川750000
出 处:《医药前沿》2020年第30期12-13,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
摘 要:目的:对比两种治疗甲状腺结节的效果。方法:选取我院2014年9月—2019年8月应用甲状腺肿物切除术的45例患者和应用甲状腺腺叶切除术手术方案的66例患者分别设为对照组和观察组,对比两组手术效果。结果:观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,并发症发生率(3.0%)低于对照组(17.7%),两组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:对于甲状腺结节手术方案的选择,甲状腺腺叶切除术是一种理想选择。Objective To explore an ideal surgical plan for the treatment of thyroid nodules.Methods 45 patients who received thyroid mass resection and 66 patients who received thyroid lobotomy in our hospital from September 2014 to August 2019 were selected as the control group and the observation group respectively,and the surgical effects of the two groups were compared.Results The operative time and hospital stay of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group,and the incidence of complications(3.0%)was lower than that of the control group(17.7%),with significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion The choice of surgical options thyroid nodules,thyroid lobectomy is an ideal choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28