应当允许自招危险之紧急避险  

Emergency Avoidance of the Actor Causes the Danger Himself Should Be Allowed

作　　者：张珂[1] ZHANG Ke(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《山西警察学院学报》2021年第1期37-43,共7页Journal of Shanxi Police College

基　　金：2018年国家社科基金重点项目“中国刑法立法现代化的理论基础与路径选择研究”(18AFX013)。

摘　　要：是否应当允许自招危险之紧急避险不仅在立法上具有多种模式,理论上对这一问题也存在各种争议。一方面要对行为人的主观罪过予以否定评价,另一方面又要对法益保护的现实效果予以正面肯定,问题的解决依赖于对权益保护和责任归属的平衡。允许自招危险下进行紧急避险,并不意味着对行为人的放纵,相反可以为其弥补自己的过错提供路径,更大限度地保护社会整体利益。但是行为人并不因为紧急避险的成立而不承担任何责任,对其自招危险行为与避险行为应当分别进行评价,综合考量各种因素。Whether emergency avoidance of the actor causes the danger himself should be allowed not only has a variety of models in the legislation,the theory of this issue also has a variety of controversy.On the one hand,the subjective guilt of the perpetrator must be evaluated negatively;on the other hand,the realistic effect of legal interest protection must be affirmed positively,and the solution of the problem depends on the balance between the protection of rights and interests and the attribution of responsibility.Allowing emergency avoidance under causing the danger himself does not mean indulgence for the perpetrator,but on the contrary can provide a path for him to make up for his fault and protect the interests of society as a whole to a greater extent.However,the perpetrator does not assume no responsibility because of the establishment of emergency avoidance,and its causing the danger himself behavior and risk-avoidance behavior should be evaluated separately,taking into account various factors.

关 键 词：紧急避险 自招危险 危险来源 利益衡量 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]