《琴瑟乐》各抄本与《闺艳秦声》的文本差异及其源流关系  

Textual Differences between QinSeLe(《琴瑟乐》)and GuiYanQinSheng(《闺艳琴声》)and Their Origins

作　　者：张树铮[1] Zhang Shuzheng(School of Literature,Shandong University,Ji’nan 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《现代语文》2020年第10期10-19,共10页Modern Chinese

摘　　要：今人整理的蒲松龄聊斋俚曲之一《琴瑟乐》,经研究发现,与上世纪二三十年代发表的署名为“西山樵子”的《闺艳秦声》实为同一作品,因而有人怀疑所谓《琴瑟乐》是改窜《闺艳秦声》后托名蒲松龄的伪作。经过对《闺艳秦声》与《琴瑟乐》三种抄本的文本差异进行全面比较,并观察各种文本之间的关系远近,可以得出结论:《琴瑟乐》三本与《闺艳秦声》系出同源,但前者并非后者发表后的抄袭改窜。其作者不是蒲松龄,《琴瑟乐》与蒲氏的关系仍有待于新材料的发现。It is found that one of Pu Songling's Liaozhai folk songs,QinSeLe(《琴瑟乐》),is actually the same work as GuiYanQinSheng(《闺艳琴声》),which was published in 1920s and 1930s with the signature of“Xishan Qiaozi”.Therefore,it was suspected that the so-called QinSeLe(《琴瑟乐》)was a forgery of GuiYanQinSheng(《闺艳琴声》)using Pu Songling’s name.Through a comprehensive comparison of the textual differences between the three transcripts of GuiYanQinSheng(《闺艳琴声》)and QinSeLe(《琴瑟乐》),and observing the relationship between their different texts,we can draw the following conclusions:QinSeLe(《琴瑟乐》)and GuiYanQinSheng(《闺艳琴声》)have the same origin,but the former is not the plagiarism of the latter.The author was not Pu Songling.Clarifying the relationship between QinSeLe(《琴瑟乐》)and Pu Songling requires further discovery of materials.

关 键 词：蒲松龄 《琴瑟乐》 《闺艳秦声》 文本差异 

分 类 号：I207.37[文学—中国文学]