走向“行动史”:中国艺术评论史书写范式与史料工作刍议  

“Action History”:A Proposal on the Writing Method and Data Work for History of Chinese Art Criticism

作　　者：侯力[1] 谢建明[2] Hou Li;Xie Jianming

机构地区：[1]东南大学艺术学院,江苏南京210096 [2]南京艺术学院,江苏南京210013

出　　处：《南京艺术学院学报（美术与设计）》2020年第6期47-51,210,共6页Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国美术史学史研究”(19ZD19);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;江苏省研究生创新项目“卡罗尔艺术伦理学及其影响研究(KYZZ16_0109)”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：评论史现有范式催生重要成果也带来困惑。为此提出“行动史”范式。以古人对艺术界人事物的评价与裁判行动为对象,分时段、分文献类别进行史料汇编,展开评论主体系统、评论史实互证、评论实践影响等研究,探讨中国艺术价值秩序的生成、承继与断裂。通过中微观选题把握中国艺术评论的实践轨迹、提升评论史的书写信度与效度。This thesis proffers a re-examinationon current researches on History of Chinese Art Criticism,which inherits its writing method mainly from works on History of Chinese Thought or Philosophy and brings puzzles by doing so.A novel method selftagged as“Action History”is proposed.It re-defines its object as“the whole sum of Chinese’s evaluation and judgement for artists,works and events in the Art World”.It applies systematical research of critics,mutual evidence research of historical facts and influence research of criticism action to profound data work through dynasts and literature category.Through the“Action History”method,we can have a better historical understanding of the nature and properties of Chinese Art Criticism.

关 键 词：中国艺术评论史 艺术评论史料学 历史书写 行动史 思想史 

分 类 号：J209[艺术—美术]