司法推理价值判断的观念与体制分析  

An Analysis of the Conception and the Institution of Value Judgment in Judicial Reasoning

作　　者：张骐[1] Zhang Qi(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2021年第2期31-42,156,共13页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“构建中国特色案例制度的综合系统研究”(16ZDA068)的阶段性成果之一。

摘　　要：司法推理价值判断是指法官在法律价值的指导下进行司法推理。指导法官进行法律推理的价值是固有价值,具有客观性,它们是构成法律精神的重要组成部分。法官需要在司法推理中符合这些基本价值。价值与价值观、价值与道德既有区别,又有联系。要坚持在司法推理中根据法律进行价值判断的原则。应当坚持司法改革,建设、发展有助于法官依法独立进行价值判断的制度安排。社会公众和法律界同行是司法场域的重要行动者,对司法推理价值判断有着不容忽视的影响;需要在他们之间建设一种积极的互动关系,以有助于法官和法院根据法治原则进行司法推理价值判断。Judicial reasoning value judgment refers to the judge’s judicial reasoning under the guidance of legal values.The values that guide judges to carry on the legal reasoning are the intrinsic values they are objective by nature.They are the important components of the spirit of the law.The judges needs to accord with these basic values in the judicial reasoning.There are differences and connections between values and the conception of value and values and morality.We should adhere to the principle of value judgment according to law in judicial reasoning.We should adhere to judicial reform and to build and to develop the institutional arrangements that are good for judges’independent value judgment according to law.The public and the legal profession are important actors in the judicial field and have an important influence on the value judgment of judicial reasoning.It is necessary to build a positive interactive relationship between them in order to help judges and courts make judicial reasoning value judgment according to the principle of rule of law.

关 键 词：司法推理 价值判断 价值判断的客观性 依法 体制 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]