知识是一种信念吗?——基于葛梯尔问题不可解性的分析  

Is Knowledge a Kind of Belief?——An Analysis from the Unsolvability of the Gettier Problem

作　　者：魏燕侠[1] 郑伟平[2] WEI Yan-xia;ZHENG Wei-ping(School of Philosophy and Social Development,Huaqiao University,Xiamen Fujian 361021,China;Department of Philosophy,Xiamen University,Xiamen Fujian 361005,China)

机构地区：[1]华侨大学哲学与社会发展学院,福建厦门361021 [2]厦门大学哲学系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2021年第1期9-14,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“问题哲学理论前沿与理论创新研究”(18ZDA026)。

摘　　要：葛梯尔问题的不可解性是当代知识论研究的一个共识。分离说主张,在知识三元分析模式中,信念成真项与信念辩护之间的分离是葛梯尔问题产生的原因。共变主义与同一主义致力于弥合信念成真项与信念辩护之间的分离,但它们自身也存在着缺陷。知识的信念假设是分离说的理论预设,它从根本上造成了信念成真项与信念辩护之间的分离是不可弥合的。信念知识论无法避免葛梯尔问题。无信念的知识论主张摆脱知识的信念假设,“知识优先”知识论与理解知识论是其两种主流进路。The unsolvability of the Gettier problem becomes a consensus of contemporary epistemology.The separation account claims that the separation of truth maker and justification of belief in the tripartite analysis of knowledge is the origin of the Gettier problem.Arguing against the separation account,covariationism and identificationism turn to bridge the separation.Unfortunately,they have their own flaws.The belief assumption of knowledge is the theoretical presupposition of the separation account,and it makes the separation unbridgeable at all.Doxastic epistemology could not escape from the Gettier problem because of the belief assumption.Epistemology without belief tries to break away from the belief assumption,two main approaches of which are knowledge-first epistemology and epistemology of understanding.

关 键 词：葛梯尔问题 分离说 弥合说 无信念的知识论 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]