检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王疆[1] 刘煜 WANG Jiang;LIU Yu(Business School,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)
出 处:《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第1期99-109,共11页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题(2017EGL010)“中国企业走出去如何‘择邻而居’——多理论视角的研究”;上海理工大学人文社会科学“攀登计划”(SK18PB06)“基于组织间模仿视角的中国企业在东盟跨国并购战略研究”。
摘 要:本文基于BVD-Zephyr全球并购交易数据库,采用2008-2017年中国企业跨国并购交易数据,分析了东道国的知识产权保护强度、集群程度对中国企业跨国并购股权选择的影响,以及行业相关性的调节作用。研究结果表明:东道国的知识产权保护强度较强,中国企业跨国并购倾向于较高的股权比例;东道国的集群程度较高,中国企业跨国并购倾向于较高的股权比例;从行业的角度看,行业相关性对于东道国的知识产权保护强度与股权选择无调节作用,而行业相关性对于东道国的集群程度与股权选择起着负向调节作用。Based on BVD-Zephyr global M&A transaction database,this paper analyzes the impact of intellectual property right protection intensity and cluster degree of the host country on equity selection in cross-border M&A of Chinese enterprises by using cross-border M&A transaction database during 2008-2017.Besides,this paper studies whether the adjustment effect of industry relatedness has any influence on the equity selection of Chinese enterprises’cross-border mergers and acquisitions.The results show that the host country’s intellectual property right protection intensity is strong,Chinese companies’cross-border mergers tend to have a higher proportion of equity.Then,the host country’s clustering degree is higher,Chinese companies’cross-border mergers tend to have a higher proportion of equity.From an industry perspective,industry relevance has no regulatory effect on the strength of intellectual property right protection and equity selection in the host country,while industry relevance plays a negative role in regulating the degree of clustering and equity selection in the host country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.11