检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王静[1] Wang Jing(College of Public Management,Guizhou University of Finance and Economics,Guiyang,550025,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州财经大学公共管理学院,贵阳市550025
出 处:《中国农机化学报》2021年第1期207-212,共6页Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71503058);贵州省软科学研究项目(黔科合LH字[2014]7279号)。
摘 要:基于诱致性技术创新理论与方法,利用贵州省茶叶主产区茶叶种植户的实地调查数据,运用因子分析和tobit模型,旨在揭示不同生产技术环境影响下,贫困地区茶叶种植户技术吸纳能力对其生产技术选择行为的差异化影响。研究结果显示:贫困地区茶叶种植户技术采用整体偏向劳动节约型,但选择劳动密集型技术的茶叶种植户仍占有较大比例。茶叶种植户技术吸纳能力在不同生产技术环境影响下,对其生产技术选择行为具有差异化影响。其中,合作社的茶叶种植户技术吸纳能力越强,其生产技术越偏向劳动节约型;政府技术推广机构示范基地的茶叶种植户技术吸纳能力越强,其生产技术越偏向劳动密集型;茶叶企业示范基地的茶叶种植户技术吸纳能力对其生产技术选择行为的影响不显著。Based on the theory of induced technological innovation,it was used the field survey data of tea farmers in main tea production areas of Guizhou Province,and used factor analysis and tobit model to analyze the impact of technology absorption capacity of tea farmer on its production technology choice in poor areas under the different technology environment.The results showed that:The tea farmers tended to choice labour saving technology in average,while the majority of the tea farmers tended to choice labour intensive technology.Technology absorption capacity of the tea farmer had different impacts on its technology choice under the technology environment.Further,the tea farmers who participate in cooperative with stronger technology absorption capacity tended to choice labour saving technology,and the tea farmers who participate in official technology base with stronger technology absorption capacity tended to choice labour intensive technology,while the tea farmers who participate in tea enterprise base with stronger technology absorption capacity had no impact on its production technology choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63