“以小说为证”与中国古代小说文体之形成  

“Take Novels as Evidence”and the Formation of the Style of Ancient Chinese Novels

作　　者：杨宗红[1] YANG Zong-hong(School of Literature, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331)

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学文学院,重庆401331

出　　处：《北京社会科学》2021年第2期14-25,共12页Social Sciences of Beijing

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“稀见晚清宣讲小说整理与研究”(18BZW093)。

摘　　要：在中国早期的小说观念下,小说多依附于子、史,几乎都是“为证”式的,非为小说而小说,故虽名为小说,实以证理为主要,兼有证教、证才、证诗、证地等,小说被视为“证据”或论证的手段。大体而言,唐前重小说“所证”,唐及后世重为证的小说文本本身。过分突出“所证”,小说本身的故事处于依附地位,妨碍了小说文体的独立;反之,作为“证据”本身及“论证”过程超越于所证,小说文体之独立性也就慢慢得以呈现。In the concept of early Chinese novels,novels are mostly attached to Zi and History,almost all of which are“for evidence”,not for the sake of themselves.Although in the name of novels,they are mainly to prove the truth,and demonstrate religious doctrine,talent,poetry and place,etc.Novels are regarded as“evidence”or a means of argument.Generally speaking,the pre-Tang dynasty paid attention to the proof of the novel,and the later Tang Dynasty paid attention to the proof of the novel itself.Overemphasis on the“evidence”,the story of the novel itself is in a dependent position,hindering the independence of the novel style.On the contrary,as the“evidence”itself and the process of“argument”surpasses the evidence,the independence of the novel style gradually emerges.

关 键 词：小说 例证 依附 文体 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]