从实业与金融到民族资产阶级与买办阶级--《子夜》成书前的文献谱系还原  

From Industry and Finance to National Bourgeoisie and Comprador--Retrospect of Document Genealogy Before Midnight Was Published

作　　者：妥佳宁 Tuo Jianing

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院

出　　处：《励耘学刊》2020年第2期240-258,M0014,M0015,共21页

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目“民国史视角下茅盾小说创作的精神历程研究(1927-1936)”,项目编号:17XZW004。

摘　　要：《子夜》创作之初并未完全展现民族资产阶级与买办阶级的冲突,而表现为实业与金融之间的消长关系。但实业与金融的冲突在创作的重心转移过程中逐步消退,最终转换为一种阶级关系的表述。1933年《子夜》正式出版前,从最初构想的“记事珠”到《提要》、分章大纲,再到小说手稿等诸多层面文本细节,遗留了这种重心转移与表述转换的大量证据,其与初版本及以后的各种版本极为不同,呈现了瞿秋白的具体影响并保留了部分未受其影响的“前瞿”表述,从而使金融与买办阶级、实业与民族资产阶级之间的单质化对应关系更加复杂。小说创作重心转移与表述转换的过程,使得《子夜》在不同时期经历了不同维度的解读,为理解茅盾左翼创作视野提供了重要材料。It is not the conflict between national bourgeoisie and the comprador class,but the growth and decline of industry and finance that was showed by Mao Dun’s novel Midnight at the beginning of writing.However,the conflict between industry and finance gradually faded in the progress of writing emphasis shift,and finally became a kind of class relations representation.Before the Midnight was published in 1933,masses of evidences of writing emphasis shift and representation transition were left in the text details of several documents including“the notes of initial idea”,the outline,the chapter outlines,and the manuscript of the novel.Different from the first version of Midnight and the versions after it,these documents showed Qu Qiubai’s influences and left some representation which was not influenced by Qu,which makes the corresponding relation between finance and comprador as well as the corresponding relation between industry and national bourgeoisie more complex.The progress of writing emphasis shift and representation transition,makes the Midnight be read differently in different periods,and provides important materials for understanding Mao Dun's left creative vision.

关 键 词：子夜 茅盾 瞿秋白 小说手稿 

分 类 号：I207.425[文学—中国文学]