检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:常江 何仁亿 Chang Jiang;He Renyi(School of Media and Communication,Center for Global Convergent Communication,Shenzhen University;Digital Media Culture Lab,Shenzhen University)
机构地区:[1]深圳大学传播学院,广东深圳518060 [2]深圳大学媒体融合与国际传播研究中心,广东深圳518060 [3]深圳大学数字媒体文化实验室,广东深圳518060
出 处:《新闻界》2021年第2期26-33,共8页Journalism and Mass Communication
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“数字新闻学理论、方法、实践研究”(20&ZD318)。
摘 要:本文以美国主流新闻媒体在2016和2020年两次大选期间的表现为切入口,深入探讨以"客观性"为核心的传统西方新闻专业主义在数字时代发生的变化,并尝试从新闻学规范理论建设的意图出发,想象数字新闻专业主义的可能内涵。研究认为,"客观性"在美国新闻业的日常生产实践中已实质消亡,而"介入性"具备成为数字新闻专业主义概念内核的潜能。文章进而阐述数字新闻学的发展必须以数字新闻业的种种事实为知识生产的依据,并主张在终结"客观性"神话的同时,积极探索新闻业在数字时代服务于信息民主和社会进步的新模式。Through analyzing the coverage of the 2016 and 2020 elections of mainstream news media in the United States,this paper explores the changes in traditional Western journalistic professionalism with "objectivity" as its core in the digital era,and tries to imagine the possible connotations of digital journalistic professionalism to construct a normative journalism theory.The study argues that "objectivity" has substantially disappeared in the daily practices of American journalists,while "intervention" has the potential to become the conceptual core of digital journalism professionalism.The article goes on to argue that the development of digital journalism must be based on the fact that digital journalism is the basis for knowledge production,and advocates that while ending the myth of "objectivity,"journalism should actively explore new models for serving information democracy and social progress in the digital age.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.169.79