糖尿病患者健康体检中实施信息化干预护理模式的效果评估  

Evaluation of the Effect of Implementing the Information-based Intervention Nursing Model in the Health Examination of Diabetic Patients

作　　者：王晶[1] WANG Jing(Physical Examination Center,People's Hospital of Jilin Province,Changchun,Jilin Province,130021 China)

机构地区：[1]吉林省人民医院体检中心,吉林长春130021

出　　处：《糖尿病新世界》2020年第24期146-148,151,共4页Diabetes New World Magazine

摘　　要：目的探讨糖尿病患者健康体检中实施信息化干预护理模式的效果。方法该次实验对在该院接受健康体检的糖尿病患者临床资料进行回顾性分析,于2018年4月—2019年4月选取96例作为研究对象,所有信息均输入Excel表格,按照住院号单双数排序分组(每组48例)。序号为奇数者实施常规护理模式,作为对照组;序号为偶数者实施信息化干预护理模式,作为观察组。比较两组患者血糖水平、健康知识掌握情况、护理满意度。结果干预前,观察组空腹血糖(11.65±2.03)mmol/L、餐后2 h血糖(15.40±3.97)mmol/L、糖化血红蛋白(8.75±1.44)%,与对照组的空腹血糖(11.63±2.01)mmol/L、餐后2 h血糖(15.34±4.02)mmol/L、糖化血红蛋白(8.65±1.52)%相比,差异无统计学意义(t=0.049、0.074、0.331,P>0.05);干预后,观察组空腹血糖(6.10±1.08)mmol/L、餐后2 h血糖(9.87±1.70)mmol/L、糖化血红蛋白(5.51±1.16)%,显著低于对照组的(9.06±1.24)mmol/L、(13.35±1.56)mmol/L、(6.84±1.39)%,差异有统计学意义(t=12.471、10.450、5.090,P<0.05);观察组糖尿病相关知识掌握情况为糖尿病发病机制与致病原因97.92%、血糖正常范围100.00%、高血糖危害性93.75%、科学运动锻炼93.75%、健康饮食95.83%、控制血糖97.92%,显著高于对照组的85.42%、89.58%、79.17%、75.00%、83.33%、83.33%,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.909、5.274、4.360、6.400、4.019、4.414,P=0.027、0.022、0.037、0.011、0.045、0.036<0.05);观察组护理满意度为95.83%(46/48),对照组为83.33%(40/48),差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.019,P=0.045)。结论在糖尿病患者健康体检中实施信息化干预护理模式,可明显增加患者对于糖尿病相关知识的掌握程度,降低血糖水平至正常范围内,提高患者的护理满意度。Objective To explore the effect of implementing an information-based intervention nursing model in the physical examination of diabetic patients.Methods This experiment conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of diabetic patients who underwent health checkups in the hospital.From April 2018 to April 2019,96 cases were selected as the research objects.All information was input into the Excel table,and according to the hospital number of odd and even,the patients were sorted into groups(48 cases in each group).The odd-numbered patients implement the conventional nursing model,as the control group,and the even-numbered patients implement the information-based intervention nursing model,as the observation group,compared the blood glucose level,health knowledge mastery,nursing satisfaction.Results Before intervention,the fasting blood glucose of the observation group(11.65±2.03)mmol/L,the 2-hour postprandial blood glucose(15.40±3.97)mmol/L,glycosylated hemoglobin(8.75±1.44)%,and the fasting blood glucose of the control group(11.63±2.01)mmol/L,2 h postprandial blood glucose(15.34±4.02)mmol/L,glycosylated hemoglobin(8.65±1.52)%were not significantly different(t=0.049,0.074,0.331,P>0.05);after the intervention,the observation group had fasting blood glucose(6.10±1.08)mmol/L,2 h postprandial blood glucose(9.87±1.70)mmol/L,and glycosylated hemoglobin(5.51±1.16)%,which were significantly lower than those of the control group(9.06±1.24)mmol/L,(13.35±1.56)mmol/L,(6.84±1.39)%(t=12.471,10.450,5.090,P<0.05);the observation group's knowledge of diabetes is diabetes pathogenesis and pathogenic causes 97.92%,normal blood glucose range 100.00%,hyperglycemia hazard 93.75%,scientific exercise 93.75%,healthy diet 95.83%,control blood sugar 97.92%,significantly higher than the control group's 85.42%,89.58%,79.17%,75.00%,83.33%,83.33%(χ^2=4.909,5.274,4.360,6.400,4.019,4.414,P=0.027,0.022,0.037,0.011,0.045,0.036<0.05);the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 95.83%(46/48),the control group was 83.

关 键 词：糖尿病 健康体检 信息化干预护理模式 血糖水平 健康知识掌握情况 护理满意度 

分 类 号：R587.1[医药卫生—内分泌]