《春秋》公羊学胡毋生师授谱系补证  

A Supplementary Evidence on Hu Wusheng’s Teaching Pedigree of Gongyang School in Spring and Autumn Annals

作　　者：程苏东[1] CHENG Su-dong(不详)

机构地区：[1]北京大学中国语言文学系,北京100871

出　　处：《北方论丛》2021年第2期19-26,共8页The Northern Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国经学制度研究”(19ZDA025)。

摘　　要：《汉书·儒林传》所载《春秋》公羊弟子嬴公的师承问题向存争议。由于《儒林传》武帝以前部分是班固在《史记·儒林列传》的基础上改笔而成,通过对改笔部分的系统梳理以及《汉书》中"自有传"体例的考察,可知班固所增弟子嬴公应师从胡毋生。在此基础上重新检视何休《春秋公羊经传解诂》的撰作动机,可知何休感于东汉官学章句繁冗、迂曲之弊,故援据严、颜二家所承胡毋生《条例》之学以纠其失,与扬雄、桓谭、班固等"不为章句"、专究大义的治学风气以及马融、郑玄、卢植等复兴西汉传诂旧体的解经风气之间存在重要的呼应。There is a dispute over the teaching succession of Ying Gong in the Gongyang School of Spring and Autumn Annals recorded in The History of the Han Dynasty·The Commentaries of Rulin.As the previous part of Emperor Wu in The Commentaries of Rulin was modified on the basis of Shih Chi·The Commentaries of Rulin by Ban Gu.Through the systematic arrangement of the modified parts and the investigation of the style of"extra biography"in The History of the Han Dynasty,it can be seen that Ying Gong,an additional disciple of Ban Gu,whose teacher should be Hu Wusheng.On this basis,we re-examine the motivation of He Xiu’s writing of The Interpretation of Gongyang Classical School Biography in Spring and Autumn Annals.It can be found that Zhangju in the official studies of the Eastern Han Dynasty are redundant and tortuous in He Xiu’s eyes.Therefore,he corrected its disadvantages through invoking Yan Anle and Yan Pengzu’s studies which originated from Hu Wusheng’s Regulations,which existsan important echo between the academic culture of Yang Xiong,Huan Tan,Ban Gu and others’idea--"not for Zhangju,only for meaning"and the culture of exegesis interpretation of Ma Rong,Zheng Xuan,Lu Zhi and others who aimed to rejuvenate the old style of interpreting classics in the western Han dynasty.

关 键 词：《汉书》 董仲舒 胡毋生 何休 《春秋公羊经传解诂》 

分 类 号：I227[文学—中国文学]