检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁超 DING Chao(Institute of Law,Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences,Chengdu,Sichuan,China 610031)
出 处:《昆明学院学报》2021年第1期74-80,127,共8页Journal of Kunming University
摘 要:随着人权的进一步发展,切实保障嫌疑人正当人权已经成为其权利保护的重点。在嫌疑人人权保障的诸多规则中,律师在场权有着举足轻重的地位。目前我国的司法实践中,没有直接确立律师在场权,所以从嫌疑人人权等正当权利的维护效能上来看不尽如人意。律师在场制度的确立对于嫌疑人基本人权的维护,实现控辩平衡;促进讯问方式改革,完善辩护制度;促进诉讼程序完善都有着不可替代的作用。With the further development of human rights,the effective protection of the legitimate human rights of suspects has become the focus of their rights protection.Among the many rules of the protection of the human rights of suspects,the right of lawyers to be present plays an important role.At present,in China′s judicial practice,there is no direct establishment of lawyer presence right,and so the maintaining efficiency of the legitimate rights for the suspects is not satisfactory.The establishment of the lawyer′s present system has an irreplaceable role in maintaining the basic human rights of the suspect,realizing the balance between prosecution and defense,improving the reform of interrogation methods and promoting the defense system,and perfecting the perfection of the proceedings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7