拉图尔社会学的历史认识论检视——走向反思社会学  

A Review of Latour’s Sociology from the Perspective of Historical Epistemology:Towards Reflective Sociology

作　　者：常照强 CHANG Zhaoqiang(School of Marxism,Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,Taiyuan,Shanxi,030024)

机构地区：[1]太原科技大学马克思主义学院,山西太原030024

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2021年第1期101-107,共7页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：对拉图尔描述取向的联系社会学,学界多从本体论的角度予以检视,其社会学对主体极的忽视往往被遮蔽了。尽管拉图尔排斥认识论,但是从历史认识论的角度来检视拉图尔社会学则可洞悉这一缺憾,并可揭示后期拉图尔从行动者网络理论(ANT)转向诸存在模式探究(AIME)的意蕴所在。经此转向之后,拉图尔与其对立者(诸如涂尔干、布迪厄以及众多的STS学者)之间的差距,事实上并非通常认为的那么大。Latour’s sociology of association,which is of descriptive orientation,is mostly examined from the ontological point of view,while his sociology’s neglect of the subject pole is often obscured.Although Latour rejects epistemology,examining his sociology from the perspective of historical epistemology can reveal not only this defect,but also the implication of his later shift from the actor-network theory (ANT) to an inquiry of modes of existence (AIME).In fact,after this shift,the gap between Latour and his opponents (such as Durkheim,Bourdieu,and many STS scholars) is not as wide as is commonly believed.

关 键 词：拉图尔 涂尔干 历史认识论 本体论 

分 类 号：N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]