我国行政复议制度的改革历程与立法完善  

Reform Process and Legislative Perfection of Administrative Reconsideration System in China

作　　者：陈子君 CHEN Zijun(Law School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期59-68,共10页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：行政复议改革激发了复议制度在行政争议解决与监督依法行政中的重要作用,但尚未实现制度改革期待的“主渠道”和“大复议”目标。究其原因在于复议体制独立性不足、复议制度在行政管理方面的专业性优势未得以发挥及行政复议与诉讼同构性的掣肘。故此次修法应坚持依法实施原则,平衡独立性和专业性的关系,并发挥行政复议的比较优势。在具体措施上,应实行差异化集中模式,在保障复议委员会独立性的同时发挥其专业性优势、拓宽复议受理范围并实现审理程序的类型化。The reform of administrative reconsideration has promoted the reconsideration system to gradually play an important role in the settlement of administrative disputes and the supervision of administration according to law,but it has not yet achieved the“main channel”and“big reconsideration”goals expected by the system reform.The reasons are that the independence of the reconsideration system is insufficient,the professional advantages of the reconsideration system in administrative management have not been brought into full play,and the isomorphism of administrative reconsideration and litigation is restricted.Therefore,this amendment should adhere to the principle of implementation according to law,balance the relationship between independence and professionalism,and give full play to the comparative advantages of administrative reconsideration.In terms of specific measures,the differentiated centralized mode should be implemented to ensure the independence of the reconsideration committee,give full play to its professional advantages,broaden the scope of reconsideration acceptance and realize the typing of trial procedures.

关 键 词：行政复议 复议权集中 专业化 主渠道 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]