检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏胜强[1] WEI Shengqiang(Law School of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001)
出 处:《扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2021年第1期77-92,共16页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“习近平关于生态法治的重要论述研究”(2019BFX017)。
摘 要:我国当前的生态司法理念存在一定的问题,它实际上是把生态理念简单照搬到司法中而形成的生态理念的司法化,其产生问题的根源也在于此。生态司法的理念不同于法律生态化的理念,司法的本性决定了生态司法的理念只能是司法理念的生态化。从根本上解决我国当前生态司法的理念问题,使生态司法回归司法本位,让司法在生态文明建设中发挥应有的作用,应当完善生态立法,推动生态理念的法律化;削减司法意见,废除与司法无关的联动机制;强化法官作用,通过法律方法贯彻生态理念。There are some problems in the current concept of ecological justice in China.In fact,it is the judicature of ecological concept formed by simply copying the ecological concept into justice,and the root of its problems lies in this.The concept of ecological justice is different from the concept of ecological law.The nature of justice determines that the concept of ecological justice can only be the ecological concept of justice.In order to fundamentally solve the problem of the concept of ecological justice in China,we should make ecological justice return to the judicial standard and play its due role in the construction of ecological civilization.We should improve the ecological legislation and promote the legalization of ecological ideas.We should reduce judicial opinions and abolish the linkage mechanism unrelated to justice.We should strengthen the role of judges and implement the ecological concept through legal methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117