价值不是一切  

Value Isn’t Everything

作　　者：约翰·贝拉米·福斯特[1] 保罗·伯克特 彭学农(译) John Bellamy Foster;Paul Burkett;Peng Xuenong

机构地区：[1]美国俄勒冈大学 [2]美国印第安纳州立大学 [3]上海大学社会科学学部哲学系,上海200433

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2021年第1期21-35,125,126,共17页Journal of Poyang Lake

摘　　要：当代左翼环境学者卡利斯、瓦迪维尔、雅辛和世界生态学家摩尔试图解构马克思的劳动价值论,以便把自然纳入价值体系,并将商品价格归因于生态系统服务,从而扩展对资本主义的生态批判。对上述做法,马克思和他的朋友们已作过批评,马克思之后的思想家也进行了反驳。上述后人类主义生态经济学理论家虽然提出了一些新问题,但其实质是在颠倒性地复制自然环境主义者提出的自然资本概念,这否定了自然和社会相互依存的辩证关系,放弃了劳动价值论所阐明的价值形式辩证法,最终陷入了资产阶级狭隘一元论的绝境。今天人类的可持续发展真正需要的不是对自然的彻底重估,而是一场革命性的生态和社会变革。Contemporary left-wing environmentalists like Kallis,Wadiwel,Yasn and ecologist Moore tried to deconstruct Marx’s theory of labor value so that they could bring nature into the value system and impute commodity prices to ecosystem services,thus expanding their ecological criticism of capitalism.Their practice,however,was not only criticized by Marx and his friends,but also refuted by thinkers after Marx.The above-mentioned post-humanist theorists on ecological economics did put forward some new problems,but the fact is that they reversely copied the concept of nature capital coined by the natural environmentalists.What they did denies the dialectical relationship between the interdependence of nature and society,abandons the dialectics of value form expounded by the theory of labor value,and finally falls into the hopeless situation of the narrow-minded bourgeois monism.What is needed today for mankind’s sustainable development is not a radical revaluation of nature,but a revolutionary ecological and social transformation.

关 键 词：劳动价值论 自然资本 价值形式辩证法 生态经济学 马克思主义生态经济学 

分 类 号：F014[经济管理—政治经济学] F062.2