检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱琰 廖建梅 常启佳 陈姝 马宽生 刘蕾 QIU Yan;LIAO Jianmei;CHANG Qijia;CHEN Shu;MA Kuansheng;LIU Lei(Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China;Department of Nursing,the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China)
机构地区:[1]陆军军医大学第一附属医院肝胆外科研究所,重庆400038 [2]陆军军医大学第一附属医院护理部,重庆400038
出 处:《重庆医学》2021年第4期609-612,共4页Chongqing medicine
基 金:重庆市科卫联合医学科研计划项目(2019MSXM092)。
摘 要:目的比较肝破裂出血急诊行肝切除术后联合用药镇痛和传统模式镇痛对镇痛效果、术后恢复情况及相关并发症的影响。方法选取50例肝破裂出血急诊行肝切除术后患者为研究对象,分为联合用药镇痛组和传统模式镇痛组,每组25例。联合用药镇痛组术后静脉留置自控镇痛(PCA)泵(地佐辛20 mg)+帕瑞昔布钠40 mg静脉注射+按需口服镇痛药;传统模式镇痛组术后仅用PCA泵。比较两组患者术后的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、恢复情况和术后10 d相关并发症发生率。结果联合用药镇痛组术日晚21点及术后1、2、3和4 d VAS评分分别为(4.7±0.8)、(4.2±0.9)、(2.8±0.7)、(2.6±0.6)和(1.6±0.6)分,明显低于传统模式镇痛组的(5.8±0.8)、(5.0±0.6)、(3.8±0.7)、(3.0±0.5)和(2.5±0.6)分(P<0.05)。联合用药镇痛组术后首次离床时间、首次排气时间、首次排便时间、首次流质时间均明显早于传统模式镇痛组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后10 d均未发生并发症。结论联合用药镇痛可明显降低肝破裂出血急诊行肝切除手术患者术后疼痛的主观感受。Objective Compare the effects of combined analgesia and traditional mode analgesia on the analgesic efficacy,postoperative recovery and related complications after emergency liver resection for hepatic rupture and hemorrhage.Methods Fifty patients with liver resection who underwent hepatectomy for emergency liver rupture were selected and divided into the combined analgesia group and the traditional analgesia group,with 25 cases in each group.The combined analgesia group was treated by controlled analgesia pump(PCA)with 20 mg dezocine+40 mg parecoxib sodium intravenous injection+oral analgesics on demand,while the traditional analgesia group was treated by PCA with 20 mg dezocine only.The postoperative visual analogue scoring(VAS)score,recovery and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The postoperative VAS score of 9 pm on the operative day and 1,2,3 and 4 d after the operative day was(4.7±0.8),(4.2±0.9),(2.8±0.7),(2.6±0.6)and(1.6±0.6)points,respectively,and all of these were significantly lower than those of the traditional analgesia group,which was(5.8±0.8),(5.0±0.6),(3.8±0.7),(3.0±0.5)and(2.5±0.6)points,respectively(P<0.05).The first time to out of the bed,exhaust,defecate and eating fluid in the combined analgesia group were significantly earlier than those in the traditional analgesia group(P<0.05).There were no complications in the two groups 10 days after operation.Conclusion Combined analgesia could reduce the subjective experience of postoperative pain in patients undergoing emergent hepatectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.101.53