检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋欣阳[1] 苏海洋 白汪洋 SONG Xinyang;SU Haiyang;BAI Wangyang(Center for International Development of TCM,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China)
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学中医药国际化发展研究中心,上海201203
出 处:《浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第4期411-415,共5页Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology:Social Sciences
基 金:上海市2020年度软科学重点项目(20692105300)。
摘 要:在新冠肺炎(COVID-19)全球化防治时期,各国相继出台预防、治疗措施,传统医学结合自身实践经验也参与到疫情防控过程中。2020年1月下旬防治期间,韩国、印度两国传统医学分别推出相应防治举措,由此产生较为复杂的舆情,引起广泛关注。采用生命周期理论,结合传染病经典SIR模型,观测分析韩国和印度传统医学防治新冠肺炎相关舆情,探寻得到民众对韩国医学存疑、印度传统医学体系缺少交流,旨在从行业角度为中医药相关舆情应对提供借鉴。During the period of global prevention and control of COVID-19,countries have successively introduced prevention and treatment measures.Traditional medicine with its own practical experience has also been involved in controlling this epidemic.In late January 2020,traditional Korean and Indian medicine were respectively ushered in corresponding prevention and treatment measures,which has generated complicated public opinions and attracted widespread concern.With the Life Cycle Theory and the classic Susceptible Infected Recovered Model of infectious diseases,this paper observes and analyzes public opinions on the control of the new corona virus pneumonia by traditional Korean and Indian medicine,and finds out the public's incomprehension of traditional Korean medicine and the incompleteness of the traditional Indian medicine system.By doing so,this paper aims to provide relevant professional references for traditional Chinese medicine on dealing with public opinions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38