检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴江[1] 吴涛[2] 张惠萍[3] 庞澜[1] 阿里木江·阿不都热合曼[1] 马秀英[1] 陈鹏[1] 朱勇荷 WU Jiang;WU Tao;ZHANG Hui-ping;PANG Lan;ALIMUJIANG·Abudureheman;MA Xiu-ying;CHEN Peng;ZHU Yong-he(Department of Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment,Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830063,China;First Department of Oncology,Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830000,China;Department of Cadre Health Care,Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830063,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第二附属医院内镜诊治科,新疆乌鲁木齐830063 [2]新疆医科大学附属中医医院肿瘤一科,新疆乌鲁木齐830000 [3]新疆医科大学第二附属医院干部保健科,新疆乌鲁木齐830063
出 处:《局解手术学杂志》2021年第2期142-145,共4页Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区自然基金(2016D01C201)。
摘 要:目的分析消化内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期食管癌的疗效及安全性。方法纳入早期食管癌患者99例,将其中以ESD为治疗方案的52例患者纳入ESD组,同期实施内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)的47例患者纳入EMR组,分析患者手术情况、术后情况、病灶切除效果、并发症及复发情况。结果与EMR组比较,ESD组手术时间和术后禁食时间较长,最大病灶直径较大,组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术后抗生素使用时间和住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ESD组病灶整块切除率及病灶完全切除率均高于EMR组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ESD组患者术后12个月复发率低于EMR组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论ESD治疗直径较大的早期食管癌具有剥离病灶彻底、复发率较低的优势。Objective To study the efficacy and safety of digestive endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)in the treatment of early esophageal cancer.Methods A total of 99 patients with early esophageal cancer were included.According to the operation methods,52 patients treated with ESD were included in the ESD group,and the other 47 patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)during the same period were included in the EMR group.The surgical status,postoperative status,lesion resection effect,complications and recurrence of patients in the two groups were analyzed.Results Compared with the EMR group,the ESD group had longer operation time,longer postoperative fasting time and larger maximum lesion diameter,and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the duration of antibiotic use and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).The en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate of lesions in the ESD group were higher than those in the EMR group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).There was no statistical significance in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).The recurrence rate in the ESD group was lower than that in the EMR group 12 months after operation,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion ESD has the advantages of complete dissection of lesions and low long-term recurrence rate in the treatment of early esophageal cancer with large lesion diameter.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120