《罗马规约》补充管辖原则条款对侵略罪的适用研究  

The Application of the Supplementary Jurisdiction Principle Clause of Rome Statute to the Crime of Aggression

作　　者：全宏亮 QUAN Hong-liang(Central South University,Changsha,Hunan,410083)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2020年第5期29-35,共7页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

摘　　要：2010年6月通过的《罗马规约》坎帕拉修正案完善了对侵略罪的定义,同时也规定了国际刑事法院对侵略罪行使管辖权的前提条件,这标志着全体人类对包括侵略罪在内的国际严重罪行加以惩治的愿望落实了坚定的一步。但是实际上,规约补充管辖原则条款在对侵略罪的适用上仍有问题存在:国际刑事法院在对侵略罪行使管辖权的空间十分狭窄,在侵略国法院可能会基于政治目的"过于积极"行使管辖权和被侵略国法院"不愿"和"不能"在国内法院调查和审判的具体情形下不能介入,最终会出现这些案件不具有"可受理性"的结果。但在具体考察规约第十七条对侵略罪适用的问题之前,需要对存在的可受理性"先决因素"即国际刑事法院文书"高度一致"性进行判定。在得出基本否定性结论的前提下,为了更好实现规约修正案对侵略罪管辖的目的,应当对现有的侵略罪管辖机制进行修改,而这主要是通过对规约本身进行修改实现的。The Kampala amendment to the Rome Statute,adopted in June 2010,improves the definition of the crime of aggression,and stipulates the prerequisite for the International Criminal Court(ICC)to exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression,which marks a firm step for all mankind to punish serious international crimes including the crime of aggression.However,there are still some problems in the application to the crime of aggression—ICC actually has a very narrow scope of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression.And ICC can hardly intervene in the situations that the courts of the aggressor country may exercise its jurisdiction"too actively"for political purposes and cases are"unwilling"and"unable"to be investigated and tried in the domestic courts of the aggrieved country.Before examining the application of Article 17 of the statute to the crime of aggression,it is necessary to judge the"high degree of consistency"between the instruments of the ICC and the national courts’.Eventually,these cases will not be"admissible"in ICC.Therefore,on the premise of reaching the basic negative conclusion,in order to make goal of the amendment of the statute to the crime of aggression achieved better,it is necessary to modify the existing jurisdiction mechanism of the crime of aggression,which is mainly achieved by modifying the statute itself.

关 键 词：补充管辖原则条款 侵略罪 高度一致性 关键因素 

分 类 号：D995[政治法律—国际法学]