检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭小波[1] 莫世赞 李翱翔[1] 梁华杰[1] TAN Xiao-bo;MO Shi-zan;LI Ao-xiang(Department of orthopedics,Qingyuan People hospital affiliated the sixth hospital of Guangzhou medical university,Guangzhou 511518)
机构地区:[1]广州医科大学附属第六医院一清远市人民医院骨二科,广东清远511518
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2021年第3期10-11,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
基 金:广东省药学会临床用药研究基金项目编号:2015ZT课题编号:20152716。
摘 要:目的:比较2种多模式镇痛方案对膝关节周围骨折镇痛效果。方法:选择我院2014年1月-2016年3月112例膝关节周围骨折的病例,随机分成观察组和对照组2组,观察组术前及术后采用丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂外用、西乐葆及乐瑞卡口服,对照组采用曲马多肌注、氟比洛芬酯静滴或者帕瑞昔布静注,记录术后6、24、48小时静息痛的疼痛评分(VAS评分)以及术后24、48小时行膝关节功能锻炼后的VAS评分,行术后24、48小时C-反应蛋白(CRP)及白介素-6(IL-6)检查,随访评价膝关节功能及骨折愈合情况。结果:观察组、对照组2组患者夜间睡眠良好,术后6、24、48小时静息痛的疼痛评分(VAS评分)以及术后24、48小时行膝关节功能锻炼后的VAS评分,无统计学差异;术后C-反应蛋白(CRP)及白介素-6(IL-6),观察组均值>对照组均值,但无统计学差异,术后2组患者均无局部皮肤坏死及皮疹,伤口愈合顺利拆线,术后骨折愈合时间(P>0.05)。结论:2种多模式镇痛方案对膝关节周围骨折具有效果,外敷及口服镇痛方案具有使用更方便,更经济实惠。Objective:To compare the ffctiveness of two types of multimodal analgesia treatment of the fractures around knee joint.Method:112 patients who had fractures around knee joints and were treated in qingyuan peoples hospital betwee January 2014 and march 2016,were enrolled and randomized to group A and group B.The group A received Celebrex,Transermal buprenorphine,Pregabalin cap-sules.The group B received Tramadol and anyone of Flurbiprofen Axetil and Parecoxib Sodium.VAS scores were recorded at6 h,24h,48h at rest and at 24h,48h during CPM postoperatively.The values of CRP and IL-6 were tested at 24h,48h postoperatively.The knee function and fracture healing time were fllowed up.Result:All patients slept well at night postoperatively.VAS scores at 6 h,24h,48h at rest and at 24h,48h during CPM after operation were not statistically significant(p>0.05)between two groups.The average values of the CRP were higher than the IL-6,but there was not statistically sigificant(p>0.05).There was no localization skin necrosis or skin rash in the two groups.All Incision healed well.Fracture healing times between two groups were not stisticlly significant differentiated(p>0.05).Conclusion:The two kinds of multimodal analgesia have good effects on fracture around the knee joint.Analgesis by way of skin and oral are more convenient and economical.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.84