社会工作模式问题再研究  

Re-discussion on the“Social Work Model”

作　　者：陈涛[1] 吴芃 Chen Tao;Wu Peng

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学社会学院,北京102488 [2]英国利兹大学

出　　处：《社会建设》2021年第1期29-36,共8页Social Construction

摘　　要：社会工作"专业化""职业化"与"社会性""志愿性"之争的本质是基于模式问题的不同建构。模式问题的模糊性引发了本土传统中的群众工作、思想政治工作及行政性社会工作与作为舶来品的专业社会工作之间的争议。对此,依据不同的要素将社会工作模式的内涵与外延做出不同的定义和分类。作为社会工作模式外延的组织模式、实务模式、理论范式及服务模式之间既有区别又有联系,其中组织模式不仅能有效地区分实际社会工作与专业社会工作,又触及了社会工作的本质,即"专业性"与"社会性"的统一。就我国而言,充分把握整体组织模式意义上的社会工作模式,有利于解决当前制约社会工作发展的内部症结,焕发活力。The essence of the debate between“professional”and“vocational”social work and“social”and“voluntary”social work is different constructions based on the question of models.The ambiguity of the model issue has led to a debate between the local tradition of mass work,ideological and political work and administrative social work,and the imported professional social work.In this regard,different definitions and classifications of the connotations and extensions of social work models have been made based on different elements.The organizational model,the practice model,the theoretical paradigm and the service model,which are the extensions of the social work model,are all different and related to each other.It also touches on the essence of social work,namely the unity of“professionalism”and“sociality”.In the case of China,a full grasp of the social work model in the sense of a holistic organizational model is conducive to solving the internal knot that currently restricts the development of social work and revitalizing it.

关 键 词：社会工作模式 实际社会工作 专业社会工作 组织模式 

分 类 号：C916[经济管理]