几种藕丝纤维与苎麻、棉纤维的结构及性能对比  

Comparison of structure and performance of several lotus silk fibers with ramie and cotton fibers

作　　者：代天娇 谷豪帅 徐慧岚 郭建生[1] DAI Tianjiao;GU Haoshuai;XU Huilan;GUO Jiansheng(College of Textiles,Donghua Universily,Shanghai 201620,China;School of Textile Science and Engineering,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an 710048,Shaanxi,China;Changshu Chenfeng Fanjia Linen Textile Co.,Ltd.,Changshu 215518,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]东华大学纺织学院,上海201620 [2]西安工程大学纺织科学与工程学院,陕西西安710048 [3]常熟晨风泛佳亚麻纺织有限公司,江苏常熟215518

出　　处：《上海纺织科技》2021年第2期6-9,共4页Shanghai Textile Science & Technology

摘　　要：测试了4种藕丝纤维的物理机械性能、形态结构、化学成分,以及抗静电性能等参数,并对4种藕丝纤维与苎麻和棉纤维进行了性能比较。结果表明:缅甸藕丝纤维较其他3种藕丝纤维力学性能好;4种藕丝纤维表面形态相似,均呈现规则的螺旋交联,截面均为实心圆形或椭圆形;藕丝纤维成分主要为纤维素、半纤维素、果胶等,并有较高含量的木质素;缅甸藕丝纤维的比电阻为7.7Ω×10^(8),高于棉纤维,低于苎麻纤维。The physical properties,mechanical properties,morphological structure,chemical composition,and antistatic properties of the four types of lotus silk fibers are tested and compared. The performance of the four types of lotus silk fibers is compared with those of ramie and cotton. The results show that Myanmar silk fiber has better mechanical properties than the other three silk fibers,but it is not as good as ramie and cotton fibers. The surface morphology of the four kinds of filigree fibers is similar to the regular spiral cross-linking,and the cross sections are all solid or oval. The reeling fiber component mainly contains cellulose,hemi-cellulose,pectin,etc.,and has a higher content of lignin. In the antistatic performance test,the specific resistance of lotus silk fiber is 7.7 Ω×10^(8),which is higher than that of cotton fiber and lower than that of ramie fiber.

关 键 词：藕丝纤维 苎麻纤维 棉纤维 形态结构 纤维性能 

分 类 号：TS102.2[轻工技术与工程—纺织工程]