检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白照杰 BAI Zhao-jie(Institute of Philosophy,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 201203,China)
出 处:《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2021年第1期5-17,共13页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
摘 要:近年,唐代道士墓志不断出世,实为学界幸事。然其中若干墓志在来源和志文内容等方面均存在一些疑问,在将之视作确凿史料用以构建道教历史之前,尤需对材料本身进行辨析思考。《咸宜观李洞真墓志》和《三洞观冯太虚墓志》均为新见唐代道士墓志,原石或拓片已为国内著名博物馆所收藏,然二者情况或仍有商酌之必要。It is fortunate for us that many new epitaphs of Tang Daoist priests have been found out in recent years.Thus,before taking them as credible historical materials to construct the history of Taoism,it is especially necessary to distinguish the authenticity of these epitaphs.Both the Epitaph of Li Dongzhen from Xianyi Abbey and the Epitaph of Feng Taixu from Sandong Abbey are“newly”found materials and the original stones or rubbings have been collected by two famous museums.However,it is still necessary to discuss the situation of them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49