挣脱与羁绊:女权主义运动与启蒙理性  

Extrication and Fetter:Feminist Movement and Enlightenment Reason

作　　者：李小妮[1,2] 李爱勇 Li Xiaoni;Li Aiyong

机构地区：[1]河南大学教育科学学院 [2]河南大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期95-106,共12页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“五四运动百年记忆史整理与研究”(18ZDA201)。

摘　　要：启蒙运动将理性作为遗产留传了下来,近代女权主义继承了其自我反思的特征,将批判的矛头指向了康德就启蒙问题对全体女性的评价。但在批判启蒙并进行自我证成和学科建设时,女权主义却难以摒弃理性反思这一启蒙运动的基本特征;其争取的“民主”“自由”“平等”等也都是启蒙运动的话语工具。论证的最终基础是历史成见而非纯粹理性,女性的自主性、女性学科的独立性以及民主、自由、平等都属于这个范畴。女权主义在批判启蒙运动、追求各种权利的同时,面临一个两难处境,那就是挣脱启蒙运动去寻求自主和羁绊于启蒙理性。The Enlightenment passed reason down as the heritage;modern feminism has inherited its characteristics of self-reflection and targeted Kant's enlightenment issue for all female evaluation.When criticizing the enlightenment and in the progress of self-justification and discipline construction,it is difficult for feminism to abandon rational reflection,which is the basic characteristic of the Enlightenment;its struggle for“democracy”,“freedom”and“equality”is also the discourse tool of Enlightenment.The final base of demonstration is the historical prejudice rather than pure ration,such as female autonomy,female subject independence,democracy,freedom and equality.While criticizing the Enlightenment and pursuing all kinds of rights,feminism is faced with a dilemma,that is,breaking away from the Enlightenment to seek autonomy or being fettered in the enlightenment rationality.

关 键 词：启蒙运动 理性 历史成见 性别问题 女权主义 

分 类 号：G913.68[文化科学]